搜题
问题详情
（多选题）下列属于操作技能培训与开发的是（）。
A车床、电脑操作等方面的培训与开发
B管理、领导技能的培训与开发
C金属工艺学的学习
D产品知识和销售操作程序
E如何处理人际关系等实务技巧
相关热点： 工艺学 技能培训
未搜索到的试题可在搜索页快速提交，您可在会员中心"提交的题"快速查看答案。
收藏该题
查看答案
搜题
相关问题推荐
研究药物剂型的基本理论、处方设计、制备工艺、质量控制与合理应用的综合性技术科学是A.药剂学SX
研究药物剂型的基本理论、处方设计、制备工艺、质量控制与合理应用的综合性技术科学是
A.药剂学
B.现代药剂学
C.临床药剂学
D.药物工艺学
E.生物药剂学
[填空题]在水处理工艺学中，采用主要阴、阳离子相互结合成假想化合物的分析研究方法。阴离子和阳离子的结合方式大致是根据锅水中所形成化合物的（）大小次序得出的。离子间应优先组合（）的化合物，假想的化合物中Ca2＋和Mg2＋的（）硬度最易转化为沉淀物，其次是它们的（），而阳离子Na＋和K＋，阴离子Cl－都不易转化为沉淀物。
商品性能主要包括商品（）等方面的性能。
A、物理、化学、机械、工艺学、生物学
B、物理、化学、包装、品牌
C、物理、化学、机械、使用
D、物理、化学、机械、工艺学、数学
共用题干
The Gene Industry
Major companies are already in pursuit of commercial applications of the new biology.They dream of placing enzymes（酶）in the automobile to monitor exhausts and send data on pollution to a microprocessor（微处理机）that will then adjust the engine. They speak of what the New York
Times calls “metal-hungry microbes（渴望吃金属的微生物）that might be used to mine valuable trace metals from ocean water”.They have already demanded and won the right to patent new lifeforms.
Nervous critics,including many scientists,wony that there is corporate,national,intema- tional , and inter-scientific rivalry in the entire biotechnological（生物工艺学）field. They create images not of oii spills,but of“microbe spills”that could spread disease and destroy entire pop- ulations. The creation and accidental release of extremely poisonous microbes,however,is only one cause for alarm.Completely rational and respectable scientists are talking about possibilities that stagger the imagination.
Should we breed people with cow-like stomachs so they can digest grass and hay,thereby relieving the food problem by modifying us to eat lower down on the food chain?Should we biologi- cally alter workers to fit the job requirement,for example,creating pilots with faster reaction times or assembly-line workers designed to do our monotonous work for us?Should we attempt to eliminate“inferior”people and breed a“super-race”?(Hitler tried this,but without the genetic weaponry that may soon issue from our laboratories.)Should we produce soldiers to do our fighting? Should we use genetic forecasting to pre-eliminate“unfit”babies?Should we grow reserve organs for ourselves,each of us having,as it were,a“savings bank”full of spare kidneys,livers or hands?
Wild as these notions may sound,every one has its advocates(and opposers)in the scientific community as well as its striking commercial application.As two critics of genetic engineering,
Jeremy Rifkin and Ted Howard,state in their book Who Should Play God?“Broad scale genetic engineering will probably be introduced to America much the same way as assembly lines,automobiles,vaccines,computers and all the other technologies.As each new genetic advance becomes commercially practical,a new consumer need will be exploited and a market for the new technology will be created.”
According to the passage,the exhaust from a car engine could probably be checked by
A: using metal-hungry microbes
B: making use of enzymes
C: adjusting the engine
D: patenting new lifeforms
The Gene Industry
Major companies are already in pursuit of commercial applications of the new biology.They dream of placing enzymes（酶）in the automobile to monitor exhausts and send data on pollution to a microprocessor（微处理机）that will then adjust the engine. They speak of what the New York
Times calls “metal-hungry microbes（渴望吃金属的微生物）that might be used to mine valuable trace metals from ocean water”.They have already demanded and won the right to patent new lifeforms.
Nervous critics,including many scientists,wony that there is corporate,national,intema- tional , and inter-scientific rivalry in the entire biotechnological（生物工艺学）field. They create images not of oii spills,but of“microbe spills”that could spread disease and destroy entire pop- ulations. The creation and accidental release of extremely poisonous microbes,however,is only one cause for alarm.Completely rational and respectable scientists are talking about possibilities that stagger the imagination.
Should we breed people with cow-like stomachs so they can digest grass and hay,thereby relieving the food problem by modifying us to eat lower down on the food chain?Should we biologi- cally alter workers to fit the job requirement,for example,creating pilots with faster reaction times or assembly-line workers designed to do our monotonous work for us?Should we attempt to eliminate“inferior”people and breed a“super-race”?(Hitler tried this,but without the genetic weaponry that may soon issue from our laboratories.)Should we produce soldiers to do our fighting? Should we use genetic forecasting to pre-eliminate“unfit”babies?Should we grow reserve organs for ourselves,each of us having,as it were,a“savings bank”full of spare kidneys,livers or hands?
Wild as these notions may sound,every one has its advocates(and opposers)in the scientific community as well as its striking commercial application.As two critics of genetic engineering,
Jeremy Rifkin and Ted Howard,state in their book Who Should Play God?“Broad scale genetic engineering will probably be introduced to America much the same way as assembly lines,automobiles,vaccines,computers and all the other technologies.As each new genetic advance becomes commercially practical,a new consumer need will be exploited and a market for the new technology will be created.”
According to the passage,the exhaust from a car engine could probably be checked by
A: using metal-hungry microbes
B: making use of enzymes
C: adjusting the engine
D: patenting new lifeforms
[判断题]烹饪学学科体系主要包括烹饪史学、烹饪化学、烹饪营养卫生学、烹饪原料学、烹饪工艺学、烹饪美学等。
A．正确
B．错误
A．正确
B．错误