t="" be="" seen="" or="" heard,="" touched="" tasted,="" even="" though="" it="" may="" all="" around="" us.="" there="" are="" other="" things="" like="" that.="" for="" example,="" radio="" waves="" us="" but="" we="" can’t="" detect="" them,="" sense="" them="" without="" a="" receiver.="" similarly,="" radioactivity="" radiation="" detector.="" unlike="" common="" waves,="" nuclear="" is="" not="" harmless="" to="" human="" beings="" and="" living="" things.At very high levels, radiation can kill an animal or human being outright by killing masses of cells in vital organs; but even the lowest levels can do serious damage. There is no level of radiation that is completely safe. If the radiation does not hit anything important, the damage may not be significant. This is the case when only a few cells are hit. And if they are killed outright, your body will replace the dead cells with healthy ones. But if the few cells are only damaged, and if they reproduce themselves, you may be in trouble. They reproduce themselves in a deformed way. They can grow into cancer. Sometimes this does not show up for many years.This is another reason for some of the mystery about nuclear radiation. Serious damage can be done without the victim being aware at the time that damage has occurred. A person can be irradiated and feel fine. Then die of cancer in five, ten, or twenty years later as a result. Or a child can be born weak or liable to serious illness as a result of radiation absorbed by its grandparents.Radiation can hurt us. We must know the truth.1.According to the passage, the danger of nuclear power lies in（ ）.2.Radiation can cause serious consequences even at the lowest level （ ）.3.Radiation can hurt us in the way that it can （ ）.4.Which of the following can be best inferred from the passage?'>
Nuclear power’s danger to health, safety, and even life itself can be summed up in one word: radiation.Nuclear radiation has a certain mystery about it, partly because it cannot be detected by human senses. It can't be seen or heard, or touched or tasted, even though it may be all around us. There are other things like that. For example, radio waves are all around us but we can’t detect them, sense them without a radio receiver. Similarly, we can’t sense radioactivity without a radiation detector. But unlike common radio waves, nuclear radiation is not harmless to human beings and other living things.At very high levels, radiation can kill an animal or human being outright by killing masses of cells in vital organs; but even the lowest levels can do serious damage. There is no level of radiation that is completely safe. If the radiation does not hit anything important, the damage may not be significant. This is the case when only a few cells are hit. And if they are killed outright, your body will replace the dead cells with healthy ones. But if the few cells are only damaged, and if they reproduce themselves, you may be in trouble. They reproduce themselves in a deformed way. They can grow into cancer. Sometimes this does not show up for many years.This is another reason for some of the mystery about nuclear radiation. Serious damage can be done without the victim being aware at the time that damage has occurred. A person can be irradiated and feel fine. Then die of cancer in five, ten, or twenty years later as a result. Or a child can be born weak or liable to serious illness as a result of radiation absorbed by its grandparents.Radiation can hurt us. We must know the truth.1.According to the passage, the danger of nuclear power lies in（ ）.2.Radiation can cause serious consequences even at the lowest level （ ）.3.Radiation can hurt us in the way that it can （ ）.4.Which of the following can be best inferred from the passage?
A.nuclear mystery B.radiation detection C.radiation level D.nuclear radiation
问题2：
A.when it kills few cells B.if it damages the few cells C.though the damaged cells can repair themselves D.unless the damaged cells can reproduce themselves
问题3：
A.kill large numbers of cells in main organs so as to cause
相关问题推荐
（ ） by the superstars on television, the young athletes trained hard and played intensely.
A.Imitated B.Imposed C.Insured D.Inspired
By the time she leaves the stage next month, she（ ）for sixty years.
A.will have performed B.has performed C.will be performing D.will perform
1. By mentioning "the same time crunch" (Line 1, Para. 2) Sandra Hofferth means（ ）.2. According to the author, the reason given by Sandra Hofferth for the time crunch is（ ）.3. According to the author a child develops better if（ ）.4. The author is concerned about the fact that American kids（ ）.5. We can infer from the passage that（ ）.
'>On average, American kids ages 3 to 13 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more than they did in 1981. They also did more household work and participated in more of such organized activities as soccer and ballet. Involvement in sports, in particular, rose almost 50% from 1981 to 1997: boys now spend an average of four hours a week playing sports; girls log half that time. All in all, however, children's leisure time dropped from 40% of the day in 1981 to 25%."Children are affected by the same time crunch (危机)that affects their parents," says Sandra Hofferth, who headed the recent study of children's timetable. A chief reason, she says, is that more mothers are working outside the home. (Nevertheless, children in both double-income and "male breadwinner" households spent comparable amounts of time interacting with their parents, 19 hours and 22 hours respectively. In contrast, children spent only 9 hours with their single mothers.)All work and no play could make for some very messed-up kids. "Play is the most powerful way a child explores the world and learns about himself," says T. Berry Brazelton, professor at Harvard Medical School. Unstructured play encourages independent thinking and allows the young to negotiate their relationships with their peers, but kids ages 3 to 12 spent only 12 hours a week engaged in it.The children sampled spent a quarter of their rapidly decreasing "free time" watching television. But that, believe it or not, was one of the findings parents might regard as good news. If they're spending less time in front of the TV set, however, kids aren't replacing it with reading. Despite efforts to get kids more interested in books, the children spent just over an hour a week reading. Let's face it, who's got the time?
1. By mentioning "the same time crunch" (Line 1, Para. 2) Sandra Hofferth means（ ）.2. According to the author, the reason given by Sandra Hofferth for the time crunch is（ ）.3. According to the author a child develops better if（ ）.4. The author is concerned about the fact that American kids（ ）.5. We can infer from the passage that（ ）.
A.children have little time to play with their parents B.children are not taken good care of by their working parents C.TV, radio and newspaper are important（ ）for advertising.
A.features B.broadcasting C.publications D.media
Directions: With the increasing development of Internet, electronic commerce (e-commerce) is becoming more and more popular, and people’s online shopping enthusiasm will be further expanded.Present your view about the problems and counter-measures of online shopping.Write an essay of approximately 200 words to support your view.Please give specific and reasonable argument to make your writing convincing.