问题详情

Fear of Dearth (缺乏)

(1) I hate jogging. Every dawn, as I thud around New York City’s Central Park reservoir, I am reminded of how much I hate it. It’s so tedious. Some claim jogging is thought (conducive); others insist the scenery relieves the monotony. For me, the pace is wrong for contemplation of either ideas or vistas. While jogging, all I can think about is jogging—or nothing. One advantage of jogging around a reservoir is that there’s no dry shortcut home.

(2) From the listless looks of some fellow trotters, I guess I am not alone in my unenthusiasm: Bill-paying, it seems, would be about as diverting. Nonetheless, we continue to jog; more, we continue to choose to jog. From a practically infinite array of opportunities, we select one that we don’t enjoy and can’t wait to have done with. Why?

(3) For any trend, there are as many reasons as there are participants. This person runs to lower his blood pressure. That person runs to escape the telephone or a (cranky) spouse or a filthy household. Another person runs to avoid doing anything else, to dodge a decision about how to lead his life or a realization that his life is (leading nowhere). Each of us has his carrot and stick. In my case, the stick is my slackening physical condition, which keeps me from beating opponents at tennis whom I overwhelmed two years ago. My carrot is to win.

(4) Beyond these completely different reasons, however, lies a deeper cause. It is no accident that now, in the last third of the twentieth century, personal fitness and health have suddenly become a popular obsession. True, modern man likes to feel good, but that hardly distinguishes him from his predecessors.

(5) With amusingly ridiculous myopia (目光短浅), economists like to claim that the deeper cause of everything is economic. Delightfully, there seems no marketplace explanation for jogging. True, jogging is cheap, but then not jogging is cheaper. And the scant and simple equipment which jogging demands must make it a marketer’s least favored form of recreation.

(6)Some scout-masterish philosophers argue that the appeal of jogging and other body-maintenance programs is the discipline they afford. We live in a world in which individuals have fewer and fewer obligations. The work week has shrunk. Weekend worship is less compulsory. Technology gives us more free time. Satisfactorily filling free time requires imagination and effort. Freedom is a wide and risky river; it can drown the person who does not know how to swim across it. The more obligations one takes on, the more time one occupies, the less threat freedom poses. Jogging can become an instant obligation. For a portion of his day, the jogger is not his own man; he is obedient to a regimen he has accepted.

(7)Theologists may take the argument one step further. It is our modern irreligion, our lack of confidence in any hereafter, that makes us anxious to stretch our mortal stay as long as possible. We run, as the saying goes, for our lives, hounded by the suspicion that these are the only lives we are likely to enjoy.

(8) All of these theorists seem to me more or less right. As the growth of cults and charismatic religions and the resurgence of enthusiasm for the military draft suggest, we do crave commitment. And who can doubt, watching so many middle-aged and older persons torturing themselves (in the name of fitness), that we are unreconciled to death, more so perhaps than any generation in modern memory?

(9) But I have a hunch (预感) that there’s a further explanation of our (obsession with exercise). I suspect that what motivates us even more than a fear of death is a fear of dearth. Our era is the first to anticipate the eventual depletion of all natural resources. We see wilderness shrinking; rivers losing their capacity to sustain life; the air, even the stratosphere (同温层), being loaded with potentially deadly junk. We see the irreplaceable being squandered, and in the depths of our consciousness we are fearful that we are creating an uninhabitable world. We feel more

相关热点: 同温层   目光短浅  

未搜索到的试题可在搜索页快速提交,您可在会员中心"提交的题"快速查看答案。 收藏该题
查看答案

相关问题推荐

有关平流层特征及卫生学意义哪一项论述是错误的

A.平流层在对流层之上

B.平流层又分两个亚层:同温层和臭氧层

C.臭氧层能吸收短波紫外线,保护人体不受短波紫外线伤害

D.同温层在臭氧层下面

E.各种气象现象都是在平流层中发生

尽管方兴未艾的太空旅游业听起来激动人心,但根据发表在最新一期《地球物理研究通讯》杂志上的研究结果,如果每年私人火箭的发射次数超过1000次,大气同温层中的污染物质煤烟的含量将会显著升高,由此可能改变全球大气循环及臭氧的分布。据研究人员计算,这将使地球两极表面温度升高1摄氏度,并使极地海洋冰层厚度减少5%到15%。尽管存在于接近地表大气中的煤烟微粒可以在降雨过程中被冲刷干净,但在根本不会有雨水的同温层中,这些污染物的留存时间却可能长达3年到10年,并对地球温度造成持久影响。对这段文字理解正确的一项是:
A.太空旅游业的蓬勃发展会改变全球大气循环及臭氧的分布B.大气同温层中的污染物质煤烟的含量会随着私人火箭发射次数的增加而显著升高C.每年火箭发射次数超过1000次,会使地球温度升高1摄氏度D.同温层中的污染物会留存3年到10年,会对地球温度造成持久影响
联系我们 用户中心
返回顶部